The acts committed by government officials obstructed justice and violated Mr. Johnson’s procedural and substantive rights to due process and the equal protection of the laws. From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or decide any case that would go against the Federal Government.case law

In November 2010, the El Paso County Procurement and Contracts Department publicly announced its recommendation to award the next five-year child support enforcement services contract to the only competing vendor, Mississippi-based Young Williams, P.C., doing business as Young Williams Child Support Services.

There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn’t have a lawyer to bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud, and speaks the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the case to be cited or published anywhere.case law

She incorporated the Court’s findings in previous orders that supported the dismissal of other defendants.” At the time of granting the dismissal, the Customer was in default under C.R.C.P. Rule 55(a) because she had not responded to the Amended Complaint, which replaced the original she had also failed to respond to as required by C.R.C.P. Rule 12. The federal court set an unnecessary” case status conference for June 13, Plaintiff suspects, the court knew of the State’s planned dismissal and intended for it to add another preclusive defense for the State or another bar to the federal court’s jurisdiction under Rooker-Feldman.

All Federal court decisions can only be handed down if the states support Federal public policy. In her response, PSI claimed it had no knowledge of the living arrangements of the child during the period shown on the motion and did not know if the Customer objected to the motion to modify.case law